BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:PUBLISH
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
PRODID:-//WordPress - MECv7.31.0//EN
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://climatelitigation.uva.nl/
X-WR-CALNAME:Climate Litigation
X-WR-CALDESC:
X-WR-TIMEZONE:Europe/Amsterdam
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Amsterdam
X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/Amsterdam
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20260329T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=03;BYDAY=-1SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20261025T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=4SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
X-MS-OLK-FORCEINSPECTOROPEN:TRUE
BEGIN:VEVENT
CLASS:PUBLIC
UID:MEC-f50a6c02a3fc5a3a5d4d9391f05f3efc@climatelitigation.uva.nl
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Amsterdam:20261026T153000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Amsterdam:20261026T170000
DTSTAMP:20260324T105734Z
CREATED:20260324
LAST-MODIFIED:20260608
PRIORITY:5
SEQUENCE:45
TRANSP:OPAQUE
SUMMARY:Transnational Climate Due Diligence (CDD): Existence, limitations and potentialities in international and comparative law
DESCRIPTION:\nPlease join us for a lecture with Dr Paul Mougeolle. He recently completed his PhD on the contribution of the concept of due diligence to the fight against climate change in international and comparative law. In addition, he works for Notre affaire à Tous (NAAT), the French NGO at the origin of the climate cases against various multinational business enterprises, the French State and others.\n\n\n\n\nPlease register here ( https://uvaforms.formstack.com/forms/paul_mougeolle )\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nAbstract\n\n\n\nThis PhD thesis explores the existence and boundaries of “climate due diligence” (CDD) owed by States and corporations in international law, human rights law and domestic law in selected Global North jurisdictions. It finds that due diligence applies to climate change, since prevention remains possible at the individual level, despite the cumulative nature of global warming. CDD is also enforceable: courts recognise climate-related impacts as injuries and establish causation through the concept of shared responsibility. The redressability of CDD claims depends, however, on the existence of either specific legislation or scientific and institutional consensus. Absent such conditions, States and corporations must benefit from wider discretion while implementing best efforts. A historical analysis of compliance with CDD reveals past and ongoing breaches by public and private Global North actors, which may give rise to secondary obligations, such as compensation or enhanced mitigation. This thesis concludes that CDD has emerged as a transnational legal norm with growing recognition across jurisdictions, and that it provides a meaningful tool to advance climate accountability. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
URL:https://climatelitigation.uva.nl/event/paul-mougeolle/
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR